Your submission physics.koshun129.2822 was accepted.

You can view this submission or make changes to it, by logging on with your current username and password. If you would like to grant someone else (co-author, administrative assistant, ...) the authority to view or change this paper you will need to provide the PaperPassword specific to this submission.

The paper id and paper password for this submission is

PaperId: physics/0602068, PaperPassword: (access still password restricted)

Abstract will appear in mailing scheduled to begin at 20:00 Sunday US Eastern time (i.e., Mon 13 Feb 06 01:00:00 GMT).

The above Paper-id/Password combination is necessary if you expect to permit others to update this submission with web replaces, modifications, addenda, or errata: be sure to save it .
( An e-mail message with this information is also on the way to your registered address: koshun_suto129@mbr.nifty.com).

After reading all of the below, be certain
to verify also your HTML Abstract and Source.

Your title and abstract will appear in the next mailing exactly as below. (Except possibly for the NUMBER which IS NOT OFFICIAL until the next mailing of abstracts [20:00 US Eastern time (EDT/EST) Sun - Thu] -- it cannot be used to cross-list to other archives [e.g., from cs to math or physics] until after that time.) To correct any problems, you MUST replace NOW.
Replacements on the same day (until the 16:00 US Eastern time deadline Mon-Fri) do not generate a revised date line, so do not hesitate to replace submission until everything is perfect (including removal of any extraneous files). 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\\
Paper: physics/0602068
From: Koshun Suto <koshun_suto129@mbr.nifty.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:51:44 GMT   (498kb)

Title: Thought Experiments whose Results do not Agree with the Prediction of
  Special Relativity
Authors: Koshun Suto
Comments: 16 pages, 6 figures, 3 tables
Subj-class: General Physics; Classical Physics
\\
  Einstein changed the problem of ether from the discussion of whether or not
it exists to that of whether or not it is necessary as a concept or a
hypothesis.
   It is true that if we give the vacuum the property as a medium that
transmits light, it becomes unnecessary to search for ether as substance.
   Even so, we have to search for an experiment to decide whether the spread of
light emitted from light source is isotropic or anisotropic relative to light
source.
   An experiment like that was formerly considered inexistent, but this paper
will show it is existent.
   In the process of Thought experiments of this paper, we will find different
results from the prediction by Special Relativity. As the cause of that, we
will show the existence of an unknown velocity vector Einstein denied.
\\
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Contains:
 Koshun.Suto-ThoughtExperiments.pdf: 509474 bytes (looks big)

Stored as: 0602068.pdf (498kb)

Warnings:

Author 1: Koshun Suto

Successful submission to the archives can be a significant source of pride and accomplishment. It entails many serious responsibilities: if you cannot check off on all of the items below, then you should replace your submission. (Note: *do not* resubmit, instead *replace*)

Submitters who repeatedly leave errors uncorrected may lose submission privilege to the archives. (Replace using the current tentative paper number unless notified otherwise.)

If your abstract is improperly wrapped, note that abstract linefill stops at whitespace indentation (e.g. a blank line or a line indented with space(s) denotes a new paragraph,and won't be wrapped).

For further hints, keep reading or see http://arXiv.org/help/ . Guidelines for a proper title and abstract preparation are given at http://arXiv.org/help/prep . If you have not already read this, please read it now to ensure that you have followed the guidelines. It is an abuse of valuable archive admin time to edit abstracts by hand.

If you need to replace this paper, then use the `replace' facility at http://arxiv.org/replace. Your entry will not officially appear in the listings until the next mailing goes out (and thus cannot yet be accessed via the search or the daily listings), and your paper number may be changed until that time, so it is necessary to wait a day before cross-listing, etc.

DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES MAKE A DUPLICATE SUBMISSION OF THIS PAPER. A resubmission is treated as a separate submission, and given a new number, which will have to be removed by hand (and could result in loss of future submission privileges). Instead use the replace facility (see http://arxiv.org/help/replace).

DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES MAKE A DUPLICATE SUBMISSION TO LIST THIS PAPER TO ANOTHER ARCHIVE within the arXiv system, since the system needs to know that it is one submission and not multiple. Instead use the cross-list facility (see http://arXiv.org/help/cross) to generate a cross-listing for it.

NOTES:

  1. Avoid excessive cross-listings: cross-listings of a paper on archive-x to archive-y are intended for subjects of *direct* interest to subscribers of archive-y. Those subscribers of archive-y who have peripheral or direct interest in the subjects of archive-x are already subscribed to archive-x and neither need nor desire multiple receipt of the same abstract. (In particular, it is exceedingly unlikely that you could decide what is of direct interest to readers of archive-y if you yourself are not an active reader of archive-y.)
  2. Common sense suggests that `replaced' papers are not immediately re-requested so if your intent is to communicate correct research it is in your interest to submit a final version in the first place, i.e. *avoid premature submissions*. If you later need to replace the submission, it would be helpful to indicate in the Comments: field (i.e. below Authors: ) how serious is the revision (e.g. v2: major conceptual changes, v3: minor grammatical changes, etc.), and include as a commented header in the revised version of the paper a guide to the changes for posterity.